This is just the beginning. We’re in Phase 1 gathering the experiences that will help every woman who comes after you. Your story matters here. Submit yours.


Shop our new arrivals:



Use coupon code WELCOME10 for 10% off your first order.

Cart 0

Congratulations! Your order qualifies for free shipping You are $200 away from free shipping.
Sorry, looks like we don't have enough of this product.

Pair with
Is this a gift?
Subtotal Free
View cart
Shipping, taxes, and discount codes are calculated at checkout

Your Cart is Empty

Dr David Kowalski

Not provided · Not provided · Public hospital & Private hospital

AblationMDT confirmed
4.0 out of 5
50% recommend
Based on 2 reviewsReviewer ages Not providedStages Not providedMost recent 2026-04-17
Feeling believed 5.0
Empathy 4.0
Information given 5.0
Recovery support 4.0
Cost transparency 3.0
Clinical knowledge 5.0
Surgical transparency 4.0
Consent & autonomy 2.0
Clinic & staff 4.0
Surgical outcome 4.0

How this patient found the surgeon was not stated in their response.

Patient 1: He listened. He felt inside been underrated previously. He didn’t push any pelvic or vaginal exams, as he said he feels I have been through too much trauma, and the body remember everything. He said based in what I had told him, he will investigate whilst I was under GA if I preferred. I really appreciated that. He was kind, and keen to help me. | Patient 2: I had a wonderful consultation experience with Dr Kowalski. He made me feel heard and validated and answered every question so kindly and professionally. I left with no doubt that he would be my surgeon.

Under 15 minutesYes - ample time and full answers30-60 minutes

Patient 1: Medical history/imaging review: Partially. Diagnosed stage: not stated. DIE/endometriomas: not stated. | Patient 2: Medical history/imaging review: Yes, clearly. Diagnosed stage: not stated. DIE/endometriomas: not stated.

Patient 1: Excision vs. ablation explained: Yes Risks/benefits explained: Yes Hormonal options discussed: Briefly Fertility considerations discussed: Yes | Patient 2: Excision vs. ablation explained: Yes Risks/benefits explained: Yes Hormonal options discussed: No Fertility considerations discussed: No

Ablates - confirmedDid not askYes, active MDT confirmed

Patient 1: Clear surgical plan given: No Warned about risk to ovaries/structures: Yes, clearly discussed and consented Felt fully informed to consent: Somewhat | Patient 2: Clear surgical plan given: Somewhat Warned about risk to ovaries/structures: Yes, clearly discussed and consented Felt fully informed to consent: No

Under 3 months6-12 months

Felt safe and treated with dignity: Yes, fully Who performed surgery: Named lead surgeon

Named lead surgeon

Patient 1: Post-surgical pain management: Pain managed but instructions unclear Follow-up: Yes, follow-up received and concerns addressed Pelvic floor physio recommended: Yes | Patient 2: Post-surgical pain management: Yes, pain managed + adequate relief to take home + clear instructions Follow-up: Yes, follow-up received and concerns addressed Pelvic floor physio recommended: Yes

Very supported, clear ongoing plan

Patient 1: Significantly improved | Patient 2: No change

Significantly improvedYesNo change

Technique

Ablates - confirmed

MDT

Yes, active MDT confirmed

Surgical photos

Yes, I was told this

Pathology

Yes, confirmed all specimens sent

Surgical volume

Yes, gave specific numbers

Referral policy

Yes, confirmed they would refer

Pelvic floor

Yes

Endo left behind

Did not ask

Endometriosis locations confirmed in surgery

Pelvic sidewallUterosacral ligament

Red flag review — across all 2 submissions

No dismissive language reported
No gaslighting reported
No unconsented removals
Cost not explained: 50%

What this surgeon did best

“He listened. He felt inside been underrated previously. He didn’t push any pelvic or vaginal exams, as he said he feels I have been through too much trauma, and the body remember everything. He said based in what I had told him, he will investigate whilst I was under GA if I preferred. I really appreciated that. He was kind, and keen to help me. — Patient 2 — I had a wonderful consultation experience with Dr Kowalski. He made me feel heard and validated and answered every question so kindly and professionally. I left with no doubt that he would be my surgeon.”

Review published2026-04-172026-04-16

What could have been better

“What stood out most about your consultation? What stood out most was that David genuinely acknowledged my ongoing chronic pain and clearly communicated that it was not acceptable for me to be living this way. He expressed a strong commitment to doing everything he could to help. He explained his approach to deep excision surgery in a thorough and reassuring way, emphasising his intention to remove as much disease as possible rather than leaving anything behind. ⸻ How did the surgeon communicate with you? Overall, his communication was very good. He explained things clearly and demonstrated strong knowledge and confidence in his approach. At times, his thoughts moved quickly and he could jump between ideas, but this felt more reflective of an active, highly engaged mind rather than a lack of clarity. Importantly, he showed a high level of empathy, care, and awareness—particularly around women experiencing pain and trauma. This was especially evident during discussions about examination, where he was mindful not to push for a pelvic exam, recognising my history and the likelihood of discomfort. I deeply appreciated that level of sensitivity and respect. ⸻ How did you feel about the outcome of your care? In terms of care, support, and advocacy, he went above and beyond. He explored multiple avenues to support my condition, including collaboration and referrals to other specialists such as bowel surgeons, urologists, and pelvic floor physiotherapists, as well as discussions around options like Botox. While I do still experience chronic pelvic pain, I do not attribute this to a lack of care or effort on his part. I feel he did everything within his scope to support me. ⸻ Would you describe your experience as positive, mixed, or negative? Why? I would describe my experience as both positive and mixed. It was positive in terms of the level of care, compassion, and professionalism I received. However, it is also mixed because, despite these efforts, I have not achieved the outcome I had hoped for in terms of pain resolution. ⸻ If you had multiple surgeries, how did this experience compare? Compared to my previous experience with a gynaecologist, where I underwent ablation, the difference was significant. My prior care felt very procedural, with minimal aftercare and support. In contrast, this experience was approached as a major surgery, with a much higher level of care, consideration, and follow-up. ⸻ What would you most want another woman with endometriosis to know before seeing this surgeon? I would want other women to know that he is a genuinely caring and dedicated surgeon who will do everything he can to help. He is not hesitant to perform deep excision surgery and appears confident and skilled in his work. I felt that I was treated with respect, compassion, and thoroughness, and that any woman in his care would be supported to a very high standard. — Patient 2 — I knew I had endometriosis for years before I got help. After 3 kids it was time to do something about it. I searched online and found positive reviews for Dr Kowalski and upon meeting him could instantly see why. He is kind and caring and professional and so knowledgeable. I have full faith in his surgical skills and would highly recommend him to anyone.”

Review published2026-04-172026-04-16

Advice for your first appointment

“This patient did not provide specific advice for other patients.”

Review published2026-04-172026-04-16
Would
recommend
to a
patient
50%

50% said they would recommend Dr David Kowalski to another person with endometriosis. Strongest among patients who had surgery (93%). Lower among consultation-only reviewers (75%), often citing wait times and cost transparency.